|
⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2018-11-07 02:39:29
Size: 724
Comment: Why I vote "no" on (almost) all California ballot propositions, even if I agree with them
|
← Revision 2 as of 2018-11-07 02:41:39 ⇥
Size: 1017
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| <<TableOfContents>> = Issues = Stuff about issues here. = Theory/philosophy = |
|
| Line 10: | Line 18: |
= Dated stuff = Various things that are only useful for the election year. == 2018 == [[https://www.spur.org/voter-guide/san-francisco-2018-11|SPUR's Nov 2018 voter guide for San Francisco]] |
Issues
Stuff about issues here.
Theory/philosophy
Voting for propositions
Why I vote "no" on (almost) all California ballot propositions, even if I agree with them. Summary:
- The compelling interest test—is this of such dire importance that the nuclear option is called for?
- The 40-year test—is it well drafted, clear and concise, not overly specific, and reasonably future-proof?
- The last resort test—is there a really good reason why it can’t become law the normal way?
Source: reddit thread
Dated stuff
Various things that are only useful for the election year.
