Voting for propositions

Why I vote "no" on (almost) all California ballot propositions, even if I agree with them. Summary:

  1. The compelling interest test—is this of such dire importance that the nuclear option is called for?
  2. The 40-year test—is it well drafted, clear and concise, not overly specific, and reasonably future-proof?
  3. The last resort test—is there a really good reason why it can’t become law the normal way?

Source: reddit thread