Differences between revisions 1 and 3 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2009-04-11 00:17:08
Size: 688
Editor: SamatJain
Comment:
Revision 3 as of 2009-06-16 17:33:07
Size: 1259
Editor: SamatJain
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 6: Line 6:
 * [[http://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/linux/GnomeSettingsIrritation|Resetting defaults with GNOME programs (Chris Siebenmann)]]: GNOME's gconf system (reminiscent of the Windows registry) makes it difficult to reset settings to their defaults, and is designed to accumulate cruft
 * [[http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=122194&action=view|Blank area above selection in GTK list boxes]]. I, and everyone I asked, thought this was a GTK bug that's existed for years. Apparently, it's [[http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=559775|desired behavior]].

I was an avid GNOME user from GNOME 1.x to GNOME 2.2. Like many other users (including Linus Torvalds), I became sick of what I perceive as an "anti-user" stance from GNOME. That is, they ignore their true users (most of the classic, Linux-using and UNIX-using crowd) for some mythical user that gets confused by options.

I'm compiling of specific transgressions so I can mention them easily in conversation.

SamatsWiki: GNOMEIsAntiUser (last edited 2015-11-05 23:00:53 by SamatJain)