Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2011-04-25 23:53:23
Size: 818
Editor: SamatJain
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2011-04-30 00:19:34
Size: 955
Editor: SamatJain
Comment: Add PR from Debian
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 7: Line 7:
[[http://11k2.wordpress.com/2011/04/24/totalitare-abmahnpraxis-700-euro-fur-das-downloaden-von-linux/|Lawyer fines user €700 distributing Linux ISOs via BitTorrent]], as user is not fulfilling terms of the GPLv2 and thus committing a copyright violation. [[http://11k2.wordpress.com/2011/04/24/totalitare-abmahnpraxis-700-euro-fur-das-downloaden-von-linux/|Lawyer fines user €700 distributing Linux ISOs via BitTorrent]], as user is not fulfilling terms of the GPLv2 and thus committing a copyright violation. The Debian project later posted a press release that this particular [[http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110427|C&D order was a prank]].

Distribution of GPLv2-licensed FOSS via BitTorrent violates the GPLv2

The FSF's GPL FAQ indirectly states that there may be a GPLv2 violation for distributing GPLv2-licensed works through BitTorrent. Directly says these issues are unambiguously addressed in the GPLv3.

A comments document from the GPLv3 development process discusses the possible GPLv2 violation regarding BitTorrent, and the need to unambiguously address it in the GPLv3.

Lawyer fines user €700 distributing Linux ISOs via BitTorrent, as user is not fulfilling terms of the GPLv2 and thus committing a copyright violation. The Debian project later posted a press release that this particular C&D order was a prank.

SamatsWiki: Licensing (last edited 2017-06-23 19:18:03 by SamatJain)